During the 2018 Dutch proxy season, shareholders actively engaged in a range of governance matters, with CEO remuneration remaining a key focus for stakeholders and widely publicised by the media. And, as always, the upcoming 2019 proxy season is likely to be influenced by happenings from the previous year.

As it was the first year that Dutch companies had to comply with the revised Dutch Corporate Governance Code 2016, long-term value creation and CEO-to-average employee pay ratios were reported and picked up by the media. Alignment between CEO pay and performance was again taken into account, and CGLytics’ AEX Proxy Review revealed 44% of companies showed a misalignment between CEO pay and performance over a one year period.

Key themes that dominated the 2018 proxy season that will again be in the spotlight in 2019:

Long-term value creation

Investors will be looking for transparency on how companies’ strategies support long-term value creation, including evaluating the merits of companies’ goals, the internal culture and how they plan to minimise exposure to governance risks.

CEO-to-employee pay ratios

As this became mandatory, companies methodology on measuring CEO-to-average-employee pay ratios varied widely, indicating a more uniformed reporting method is required for fair and accurate measurement. Companies that displayed a large gap were called out by the media in 2018, which should be a consideration for Dutch companies going forward. Companies should expect and be ready to disclose and discuss reported figures.

CEO pay for performance alignment

CGLytics Pay for Performance Study conducted on the AEX 25 companies revealed 44% of companies were misaligned over one year, and 38% were misaligned over a three-year basis. Although these numbers appear significant, it was perceived that there was improvement in the balancing of compensation of AEX CEO’s over the long-term.

The reporting of CEO pay for performance will continue to be a hot topic in the 2019 proxy season, and companies can expect pressure from media, public and shareholders if any extreme executive pay policies and practices are revealed.

Getting ready for the upcoming season

Boards need to be fully prepared to engage during the upcoming proxy season. They must be equally, if not better, informed as shareholders, so they can engage constructively and avoid any reputational risks. Having access to the same intelligence and benchmarking tools as proxy advisors and investors is imperative to prepare.

Click here to download your copy of the CGLytics’ 2018 AEX Proxy Review: Shining the light on pay practices

Aniel Mahabier

CGLytics

Latest Industry News, Views & Information

Tesco’s Shareholders Vote Against the Approval of Directors’ Remuneration Report

At Tesco’s AGM on Friday June 26, 2020, two-thirds of the shareholders voted against the resolution to approve the Directors’ remuneration report. Find out why

Bennett and the Ashford Companies: Corporate Governance Pitfalls and Lessons

The companies controlled by hotelier Monty Bennett have seen controversy for exploiting a government loan program designed to help small businesses. Learn how misaligned Pay for Performance, and an unbalanced board, can result in poor decision-making and increase governance risk.

AMP Receives Second “First Strike” Within Three Years

This article examines AMP Limited’s governance practices, board of directors’ skills and expertise, and their CEO Pay for Performance, to undestand why it found itself in hot water with the Australian Royal Commission.