How to take testing of equity-based compensation plans into your own hands?

Equity-based compensation proposals have attracted high levels of shareholder disapproval in the past, which costs a company valuable time and money. Both companies and investors need to ensure equity plans drive the company forward by supporting goals without being too costly or dilutive.

  • What are the common concerns for companies and investors surrounding equity compensation plans?
  • What should both companies and investors take into account when designing, amending or assessing equity plans?
  • How can Glass Lewis’ Equity Compensation Model (ECM) help users understand the strengths and weaknesses of plans?

Download the whitepaper and learn more about equity compensation plan best practice and how the ECM is supporting decision-making for Say on Pay.

DOWNLOAD THE REPORT

Latest Industry News, Views & Information

  • All
  • Blog

Concern over Wesfarmers’ executive pay?

Wesfarmers, which owns some of Australia’s most recognizable brands, sees concerns from shareholders and proxy advisors regarding its CEO and executive pay during the last proxy season

The DOs and DON’Ts when rethinking incentive plans

Why have 75% of first-time say-on-pay votes failed in 2019? A large number of negative votes can be attributed to incentives. Companies need to rethink their incentive plans and make sure metrics truly benchmark performance.

Sims Metal Management: Tracking Pay for Performance Over Time

A key element in an assessment of remuneration outcomes is the payout track record and payout variability over several years. Sophisticated remuneration structures should result in pay outcomes which vary in line with performance.

Access the Glass Lewis' 2020 Pay-for-Performance Model, Grade and Peers via CGLytics

CGLytics has replaced Equilar and is the only authorized distributor of Glass Lewis’ compensation models and peers from January 1, 2020.

Read more